| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the future we will need to perform a sequence of invocations of the
program for testing purposes, with each having a slightly different
execution context. Such a scheme does not map very well to the existing
design where we essentially just have a function invocation to run the
program. We would either have functions that produce a different
execution context or pass in the data to modify.
Neither of these approaches is appealing and so this change reworks the
code slightly. With it, we now can create a Nitrocli object, which
contains the data that diverges from the default execution context. This
data will eventually be modifiable by callers.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For testing purposes it is beneficial to be able to check for expected
errors with the least amount of boiler plate code possible. This change
attempts to be a first step into this direction. It introduces a
test-only trait that can be used to directly unwrap a specific error
from a Result<T, crate::error::Error>.
|
|
|
This change introduces the first set of integration-style test for the
application. Those tests may or may not connect to an actual Nitrokey
device (depending on what they test). We use the nitrokey-test crate's
test attribute macro to automatically dispatch tests to connected
devices or skip them if a required device is not present. It also
provides the means for automatically serializing tests.
|
