diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'unittest/Catch/projects/SelfTest/ConditionTests.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | unittest/Catch/projects/SelfTest/ConditionTests.cpp | 335 |
1 files changed, 335 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/unittest/Catch/projects/SelfTest/ConditionTests.cpp b/unittest/Catch/projects/SelfTest/ConditionTests.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d1b7ed2 --- /dev/null +++ b/unittest/Catch/projects/SelfTest/ConditionTests.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,335 @@ +/* + * Created by Phil on 08/11/2010. + * Copyright 2010 Two Blue Cubes Ltd. All rights reserved. + * + * Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying + * file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) + */ +#ifdef __clang__ +# pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wpadded" +# pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wc++98-compat" +#endif + +#include "catch.hpp" + +#include <string> +#include <limits> + +struct TestData { + TestData() + : int_seven( 7 ), + str_hello( "hello" ), + float_nine_point_one( 9.1f ), + double_pi( 3.1415926535 ) + {} + + int int_seven; + std::string str_hello; + float float_nine_point_one; + double double_pi; +}; + + +struct TestDef { + TestDef& operator + ( const std::string& ) { + return *this; + } + TestDef& operator[]( const std::string& ) { + return *this; + } + +}; + +// The "failing" tests all use the CHECK macro, which continues if the specific test fails. +// This allows us to see all results, even if an earlier check fails + +// Equality tests +TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should succeed", "" ) +{ + + TestDef td; + td + "hello" + "hello"; + + TestData data; + + REQUIRE( data.int_seven == 7 ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.1f ) ); + REQUIRE( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415926535 ) ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello == "hello" ); + REQUIRE( "hello" == data.str_hello ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() == 5 ); + + double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1; + REQUIRE( x == Approx( 1.3 ) ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "Equality checks that should fail", "[.][failing][!mayfail]" ) +{ + TestData data; + + CHECK( data.int_seven == 6 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven == 8 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven == 0 ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.11f ) ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 9.0f ) ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 1 ) ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one == Approx( 0 ) ); + CHECK( data.double_pi == Approx( 3.1415 ) ); + CHECK( data.str_hello == "goodbye" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello == "hell" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello == "hello1" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello.size() == 6 ); + + double x = 1.1 + 0.1 + 0.1; + CHECK( x == Approx( 1.301 ) ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should succeed", "" ) +{ + TestData data; + + REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 6 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven != 8 ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.11f ) ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.0f ) ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 1 ) ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 0 ) ); + REQUIRE( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415 ) ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "goodbye" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hell" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello != "hello1" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello.size() != 6 ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "Inequality checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" ) +{ + TestData data; + + CHECK( data.int_seven != 7 ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one != Approx( 9.1f ) ); + CHECK( data.double_pi != Approx( 3.1415926535 ) ); + CHECK( data.str_hello != "hello" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello.size() != 5 ); +} + +// Ordering comparison tests +TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should succeed", "" ) +{ + TestData data; + + REQUIRE( data.int_seven < 8 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 6 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven > 0 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven > -1 ); + + REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 7 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven >= 6 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 7 ); + REQUIRE( data.int_seven <= 8 ); + + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one > 9 ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 10 ); + REQUIRE( data.float_nine_point_one < 9.2 ); + + REQUIRE( data.str_hello <= "hello" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello >= "hello" ); + + REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "hellp" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello < "zebra" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "hellm" ); + REQUIRE( data.str_hello > "a" ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "Ordering comparison checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" ) +{ + TestData data; + + CHECK( data.int_seven > 7 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven < 7 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven > 8 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven < 6 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven < 0 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven < -1 ); + + CHECK( data.int_seven >= 8 ); + CHECK( data.int_seven <= 6 ); + + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one < 9 ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 10 ); + CHECK( data.float_nine_point_one > 9.2 ); + + CHECK( data.str_hello > "hello" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello < "hello" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello > "hellp" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello > "z" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello < "hellm" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello < "a" ); + + CHECK( data.str_hello >= "z" ); + CHECK( data.str_hello <= "a" ); +} + +// Comparisons with int literals +TEST_CASE( "Comparisons with int literals don't warn when mixing signed/ unsigned", "" ) +{ + int i = 1; + unsigned int ui = 2; + long l = 3; + unsigned long ul = 4; + char c = 5; + unsigned char uc = 6; + + REQUIRE( i == 1 ); + REQUIRE( ui == 2 ); + REQUIRE( l == 3 ); + REQUIRE( ul == 4 ); + REQUIRE( c == 5 ); + REQUIRE( uc == 6 ); + + REQUIRE( 1 == i ); + REQUIRE( 2 == ui ); + REQUIRE( 3 == l ); + REQUIRE( 4 == ul ); + REQUIRE( 5 == c ); + REQUIRE( 6 == uc ); + + REQUIRE( (std::numeric_limits<unsigned long>::max)() > ul ); +} + +// Disable warnings about sign conversions for the next two tests +// (as we are deliberately invoking them) +// - Currently only disabled for GCC/ LLVM. Should add VC++ too +#ifdef __GNUC__ +#pragma GCC diagnostic push +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-compare" +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wsign-conversion" +#endif +#ifdef _MSC_VER +#pragma warning(disable:4389) // '==' : signed/unsigned mismatch +#endif + +TEST_CASE( "comparisons between int variables", "" ) +{ + long long_var = 1L; + unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1; + unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1; + unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1; + unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L; + + REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_char_var ); + REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_short_var ); + REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_int_var ); + REQUIRE( long_var == unsigned_long_var ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "comparisons between const int variables", "" ) +{ + const unsigned char unsigned_char_var = 1; + const unsigned short unsigned_short_var = 1; + const unsigned int unsigned_int_var = 1; + const unsigned long unsigned_long_var = 1L; + + REQUIRE( unsigned_char_var == 1 ); + REQUIRE( unsigned_short_var == 1 ); + REQUIRE( unsigned_int_var == 1 ); + REQUIRE( unsigned_long_var == 1 ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between unsigned ints and negative signed ints match c++ standard behaviour", "" ) +{ + CHECK( ( -1 > 2u ) ); + CHECK( -1 > 2u ); + + CHECK( ( 2u < -1 ) ); + CHECK( 2u < -1 ); + + const int minInt = (std::numeric_limits<int>::min)(); + CHECK( ( minInt > 2u ) ); + CHECK( minInt > 2u ); +} + +template<typename T> +struct Ex +{ + Ex( T ){} + + bool operator == ( const T& ) const { return true; } + T operator * ( const T& ) const { return T(); } +}; + +TEST_CASE( "Comparisons between ints where one side is computed", "" ) +{ + CHECK( 54 == 6*9 ); +} + +#ifdef __GNUC__ +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop +#endif + +inline const char* returnsConstNull(){ return CATCH_NULL; } +inline char* returnsNull(){ return CATCH_NULL; } + +TEST_CASE( "Pointers can be compared to null", "" ) +{ + TestData* p = CATCH_NULL; + TestData* pNULL = CATCH_NULL; + + REQUIRE( p == CATCH_NULL ); + REQUIRE( p == pNULL ); + + TestData data; + p = &data; + + REQUIRE( p != CATCH_NULL ); + + const TestData* cp = p; + REQUIRE( cp != CATCH_NULL ); + + const TestData* const cpc = p; + REQUIRE( cpc != CATCH_NULL ); + + REQUIRE( returnsNull() == CATCH_NULL ); + REQUIRE( returnsConstNull() == CATCH_NULL ); + + REQUIRE( CATCH_NULL != p ); +} + +// Not (!) tests +// The problem with the ! operator is that it has right-to-left associativity. +// This means we can't isolate it when we decompose. The simple REQUIRE( !false ) form, therefore, +// cannot have the operand value extracted. The test will work correctly, and the situation +// is detected and a warning issued. +// An alternative form of the macros (CHECK_FALSE and REQUIRE_FALSE) can be used instead to capture +// the operand value. +TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should succeed", "" ) +{ + bool falseValue = false; + + REQUIRE( false == false ); + REQUIRE( true == true ); + REQUIRE( !false ); + REQUIRE_FALSE( false ); + + REQUIRE( !falseValue ); + REQUIRE_FALSE( falseValue ); + + REQUIRE( !(1 == 2) ); + REQUIRE_FALSE( 1 == 2 ); +} + +TEST_CASE( "'Not' checks that should fail", "[.][failing]" ) +{ + bool trueValue = true; + + CHECK( false != false ); + CHECK( true != true ); + CHECK( !true ); + CHECK_FALSE( true ); + + CHECK( !trueValue ); + CHECK_FALSE( trueValue ); + + CHECK( !(1 == 1) ); + CHECK_FALSE( 1 == 1 ); +} + |