Squashed 'unittest/Catch/' content from commit ae5ee2cf

git-subtree-dir: unittest/Catch
git-subtree-split: ae5ee2cf63d6d67bd1369b512d2a7b60b571c907

1 files changed, 401 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/projects/SelfTest/TrickyTests.cpp b/projects/SelfTest/TrickyTests.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb53e42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/projects/SelfTest/TrickyTests.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
+/*
+ *  Created by Phil on 09/11/2010.
+ *  Copyright 2010 Two Blue Cubes Ltd. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ *  Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
+ *  file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
+ */
+
+#ifdef __clang__
+#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wpadded"
+#endif
+
+#include "catch.hpp"
+
+#ifdef __clang__
+#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wc++98-compat"
+#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wc++98-compat-pedantic"
+#endif
+
+namespace Catch
+{
+    template<>
+    std::string toString<std::pair<int, int> >( const std::pair<int, int>& value )
+    {
+        std::ostringstream oss;
+        oss << "std::pair( " << value.first << ", " << value.second << " )";
+        return oss.str();
+
+    }
+}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "Parsing a std::pair",
+    "[Tricky][std::pair]"
+)
+{
+    std::pair<int, int> aNicePair( 1, 2 );
+
+    REQUIRE( (std::pair<int, int>( 1, 2 )) == aNicePair );
+}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "Where there is more to the expression after the RHS",
+    "[Tricky][failing][.]"
+)
+{
+//    int a = 1, b = 2;
+//    REQUIRE( a == 2 || b == 2 );
+    WARN( "Uncomment the code in this test to check that it gives a sensible compiler error" );
+}
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "Where the LHS is not a simple value",
+    "[Tricky][failing][.]"
+)
+{
+    /*
+    int a = 1;
+    int b = 2;
+
+    // This only captures part of the expression, but issues a warning about the rest
+    REQUIRE( a+1 == b-1 );
+    */
+    WARN( "Uncomment the code in this test to check that it gives a sensible compiler error" );
+}
+
+struct Opaque
+{
+    int val;
+    bool operator ==( const Opaque& o ) const
+    {
+        return val == o.val;
+    }
+};
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "A failing expression with a non streamable type is still captured",
+    "[Tricky][failing][.]"
+)
+{
+
+    Opaque o1, o2;
+    o1.val = 7;
+    o2.val = 8;
+
+    CHECK( &o1 == &o2 );
+    CHECK( o1 == o2 );
+}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "string literals of different sizes can be compared",
+    "[Tricky][failing][.]"
+)
+{
+    REQUIRE( std::string( "first" ) == "second" );
+
+}
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "An expression with side-effects should only be evaluated once",
+    "[Tricky]"
+)
+{
+    int i = 7;
+
+    REQUIRE( i++ == 7 );
+    REQUIRE( i++ == 8 );
+
+}
+
+namespace A {
+    struct X
+    {
+        X() : a(4), b(2), c(7) {}
+        X(int v) : a(v), b(2), c(7) {}
+        int a;
+        int b;
+        int c;
+    };
+}
+
+namespace B {
+    struct Y
+    {
+        Y() : a(4), b(2), c(7) {}
+        Y(int v) : a(v), b(2), c(7) {}
+        int a;
+        int b;
+        int c;
+    };
+}
+
+inline bool operator==(const A::X& lhs, const B::Y& rhs)
+{
+    return (lhs.a == rhs.a);
+}
+
+inline bool operator==(const B::Y& lhs, const A::X& rhs)
+{
+    return (lhs.a == rhs.a);
+}
+
+
+///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+/* This, currently, does not compile with LLVM
+TEST_CASE
+(
+    "Operators at different namespace levels not hijacked by Koenig lookup"
+    "[Tricky]"
+)
+{
+    A::X x;
+    B::Y y;
+    REQUIRE( x == y );
+}
+*/
+
+namespace ObjectWithConversions
+{
+    struct Object
+    {
+        operator unsigned int() {return 0xc0000000;}
+    };
+
+    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+    TEST_CASE
+    (
+        "Operators at different namespace levels not hijacked by Koenig lookup",
+        "[Tricky]"
+    )
+    {
+        Object o;
+        REQUIRE(0xc0000000 == o );
+    }
+}
+
+namespace ObjectWithNonConstEqualityOperator
+{
+    struct Test
+    {
+        Test( unsigned int v )
+        : m_value(v)
+        {}
+
+        bool operator==( const Test&rhs )
+        {
+            return (m_value == rhs.m_value);
+        }
+        bool operator==( const Test&rhs ) const
+        {
+            return (m_value != rhs.m_value);
+        }
+        unsigned int m_value;
+    };
+
+    TEST_CASE("Demonstrate that a non-const == is not used", "[Tricky]" )
+    {
+        Test t( 1 );
+        REQUIRE( t == 1u );
+    }
+}
+
+namespace EnumBitFieldTests
+{
+    enum Bits {bit0 = 0x0001, bit1 = 0x0002, bit2 = 0x0004, bit3 = 0x0008, bit1and2 = 0x0006,
+        bit30 = 0x40000000, bit31 = 0x80000000,
+        bit30and31 = 0xc0000000};
+
+    TEST_CASE( "Test enum bit values", "[Tricky]" )
+    {
+        REQUIRE( 0xc0000000 == bit30and31 );
+    }
+}
+
+struct Obj
+{
+    Obj():prop(&p){}
+
+    int p;
+    int* prop;
+};
+
+TEST_CASE("boolean member", "[Tricky]")
+{
+    Obj obj;
+    REQUIRE( obj.prop != CATCH_NULL );
+}
+
+// Tests for a problem submitted by Ralph McArdell
+//
+// The static bool value should not need to be defined outside the
+// struct it is declared in - but when evaluating it in a deduced
+// context it appears to require the extra definition.
+// The issue was fixed by adding bool overloads to bypass the
+// templates that were there to deduce it.
+template <bool B>
+struct is_true
+{
+    static const bool value = B;
+};
+
+TEST_CASE( "(unimplemented) static bools can be evaluated", "[Tricky]" )
+{
+    SECTION("compare to true","")
+    {
+        REQUIRE( is_true<true>::value == true );
+        REQUIRE( true == is_true<true>::value );
+    }
+    SECTION("compare to false","")
+    {
+        REQUIRE( is_true<false>::value == false );
+        REQUIRE( false == is_true<false>::value );
+    }
+
+    SECTION("negation", "")
+    {
+        REQUIRE( !is_true<false>::value );
+    }
+
+    SECTION("double negation","")
+    {
+        REQUIRE( !!is_true<true>::value );
+    }
+
+    SECTION("direct","")
+    {
+        REQUIRE( is_true<true>::value );
+        REQUIRE_FALSE( is_true<false>::value );
+    }
+}
+
+// Uncomment these tests to produce an error at test registration time
+/*
+TEST_CASE( "Tests with the same name are not allowed", "[Tricky]" )
+{
+
+}
+TEST_CASE( "Tests with the same name are not allowed", "[Tricky]" )
+{
+
+}
+*/
+
+struct Boolable
+{
+    explicit Boolable( bool value ) : m_value( value ) {}
+
+    operator Catch::SafeBool::type() const {
+        return Catch::SafeBool::makeSafe( m_value );
+    }
+
+    bool m_value;
+};
+
+TEST_CASE( "Objects that evaluated in boolean contexts can be checked", "[Tricky][SafeBool]" )
+{
+    Boolable True( true );
+    Boolable False( false );
+
+    CHECK( True );
+    CHECK( !False );
+    CHECK_FALSE( False );
+}
+
+TEST_CASE( "Assertions then sections", "[Tricky]" )
+{
+    // This was causing a failure due to the way the console reporter was handling
+    // the current section
+
+    REQUIRE( Catch::alwaysTrue() );
+
+    SECTION( "A section", "" )
+    {
+        REQUIRE( Catch::alwaysTrue() );
+
+        SECTION( "Another section", "" )
+        {
+            REQUIRE( Catch::alwaysTrue() );
+        }
+        SECTION( "Another other section", "" )
+        {
+            REQUIRE( Catch::alwaysTrue() );
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+struct Awkward
+{
+    operator int() const { return 7; }
+};
+
+TEST_CASE( "non streamable - with conv. op", "[Tricky]" )
+{
+    Awkward awkward;
+    std::string s = Catch::toString( awkward );
+    REQUIRE( s == "7" );
+}
+
+inline void foo() {}
+
+typedef void (*fooptr_t)();
+
+TEST_CASE( "Comparing function pointers", "[Tricky][function pointer]" )
+{
+    // This was giving a warning in VS2010
+    // #179
+    fooptr_t a = foo;
+
+    REQUIRE( a );
+    REQUIRE( a == &foo );
+}
+
+struct S
+{
+    void f() {}
+};
+
+
+TEST_CASE( "Comparing member function pointers", "[Tricky][member function pointer]" )
+{
+    typedef void (S::*MF)();
+    MF m = &S::f;
+
+    CHECK( m == &S::f );
+}
+
+class ClassName {};
+
+TEST_CASE( "pointer to class", "[Tricky]" )
+{
+   ClassName *p = 0;
+   REQUIRE( p == 0 );
+}
+
+#ifdef CATCH_CONFIG_CPP11_NULLPTR
+
+#include <memory>
+
+TEST_CASE( "null_ptr", "[Tricky][c++11]" )
+{
+    std::unique_ptr<int> ptr;
+    REQUIRE(ptr.get() == nullptr);
+}
+
+#endif
+
+TEST_CASE( "X/level/0/a", "[Tricky]" )      { SUCCEED(""); }
+TEST_CASE( "X/level/0/b", "[Tricky][fizz]" ){ SUCCEED(""); }
+TEST_CASE( "X/level/1/a", "[Tricky]" )      { SUCCEED(""); }
+TEST_CASE( "X/level/1/b", "[Tricky]" )      { SUCCEED(""); }